Tracking Money and Influence in the UK and Europe
This paper explores transnational anti-rights mobilisation as a hybrid threat to UK and European democracy, driven by foreign actors, funding and influence.
Overview
This paper highlights the growing threat of transnational anti-rights mobilisation to the UK and European democracy, driven by foreign actors, funding and influence. It examines how identity-based narratives are strategically weaponised to undermine democratic resilience, erode human rights protections and destabilise governance. The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the actors, funding channels and operational strategies behind these movements, with a focus on their impact on UK security and policy.
Key recommendations for UK and European governments include:
- Establishing a cross-government standard for assessing funding sources and coordinated activities.
- Implementing minimum disclosure requirements for organisations involved in policy processes.
- Closing reporting gaps in intermediary and cross-border funding structures.
- Enhancing procedural integrity in consultations and committee processes.
- Developing joint analytics capabilities to trace funding and influence networks.
- Addressing mobilisation in information spaces and multilateral forums.
- Creating early-warning and response protocols for targeted institutions.
This paper provides actionable insights to strengthen democratic resilience and counter the growing influence of anti-rights movements.
Register or log in to continue reading
Account creation is quick, free and gives access to all RUSI research and more
- FREE account
- One-time set-up
- Easy to manage
Introduction
In the UK, Europe and beyond, new forms of authoritarian influences are increasing, embedding themselves into social, political and legal infrastructures. At the forefront is the exploitation of identity-based issues, from gender and migration to LGBTQIA+, to undermine equality protections and attack democratic and human rights advancements. This ‘anti-rights’ agenda, rooted in far-right ideologies often tied to ultra-religious and conservative values, proliferated around the globe. Although even a few years ago anti-rights mobilisation garnered little attention (considering decades of progressive norms and rights establishment), the growing threats it poses for countries across Europe today can no longer be ignored. The manifestation of anti-rights mobilisation has taken new forms, functioning as a form of authoritarian influence, involving a multitude of state and non-state actors. The overall objective is the weakening of democratic institutions, resilience and social cohesion. While neither anti-rights nor authoritarian trends are new to the UK and Europe, as they are also a homegrown phenomenon as well, there are increasing and diverse foreign and domestic actors fuelling the rise of these manifestations.
The aim of this paper is to assess anti-rights mobilisation as a transnational and hybrid threat, examining the role of foreign actors, money and influence streams, and their impacts on the UK. It highlights how foreign support, particularly from Russia and the US, contributes to the spread and intensification of anti-rights narratives, social sentiments, and radical ideologies within the UK and Europe more generally – becoming a key part of the global authoritarian playbook and posing national and international security concerns. These trends are among the hybrid threats arguably regarded as 'malign' by the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) in written evidence to the Foreign Affairs Committee Inquiry.
To achieve this, the paper answers the following key questions:
- What state and non-state actors are involved in shaping and funding these activities?
- What is the tangible impact of transnational anti-rights mobilisation on security?
- Why is this an important issue for the UK and others to consider from a security perspective, rather than a question of opposing values?
Recent investigative efforts have started to uncover and analyse the key actors, influence networks and methods, and impact of anti-rights mobilisation and role of foreign actors in not only targeting, but also bolstering, anti-rights dynamics in the UK and Europe. This paper goes beyond mapping and identifying anti-rights dynamics, focusing on exploring the national security impact of this mobilisation in the UK. The paper offers a concise framing of anti-rights mobilisation as a challenge to resilience, then centres on the channels fuelling it and the resulting impact on the UK. Case studies further demonstrate where and how these dynamics manifest, and expand on their social, political and legislative impact. Finally, the paper discusses the challenges and complexities of countering this threat and presents recommendations for UK and European policymakers to mitigate and address it.
WRITTEN BY
Dr Joana de Deus Pereira
Senior Research Fellow
RUSI Europe
Petra Regeni
Research Analyst and Project Officer
RUSI Europe
Claudia Wallner
Research Fellow
Dr Jessica White
Director of Terrorism and Conflict Studies
Terrorism and Conflict
- Jim McLeanMedia Relations Manager+44 (0)7917 373 069JimMc@rusi.org
Footnotes
Illiberalism and authoritarianism are distinct concepts that also overlap. They both feature overarching anti-democratic (or illiberal democratic) tendencies but differ in intensity and mechanisms. Generally illiberal governance precedes, or acts as a gateway, to authoritarianism. While authoritarian governance models concentrate power (seeking) to dismantle or demolish political opposition and democratic institutions and practices, illiberal models merely hollow out or erode them while maintaining the façade or leaving the shell and semblances of democratic practices. For more information, see Radosław Markowski et al., ‘Literature Review: Illiberalism, Authoritarianism and Populism’, AuthLIB, 28 February 2023, <https://www.authlib.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/AUTHLIB_D2.1_Literature-review.pdf>, accessed 6 March 2026.
The first paper in this series analyses this discursive repertoire and its circulation in detail; this piece discusses the enabling architecture and institutional channels. To read the first paper, see Claudia Wallner et al., ‘Hostile States and the Far Right: Converging Tactics’, RUSI Insights Papers, 10 February 2026, < https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/insights-papers/hostile-states-and-far-right-converging-tactics>, accessed 10 February 2026.
The term ‘dark money’ refers in this paper to ‘funds contributed anonymously or through opaque channels, obscuring the true sources behind donations. This hidden funding can significantly influence nonprofit agendas, public policy debates, and governance, without revealing who ultimately finances the activities’. For more information, see NGO Report, ‘Dark Money in the Nonprofit World: Uncovering Hidden Funding Channels’, blog, 23 October 2025, <https://ngoreport.org/dark-money-in-the-nonprofit-world-uncovering-hidden-funding-channels/>, accessed 6 March 2026.
GONGOs are formally non-governmental organisations that are set up or sponsored by the government in order to further its political interests either at home or abroad. In authoritarian states, GONGOs play the role of a docile civil society organisation, supportive of the government and implementing state policy among a specific sub-group of citizens.
For more information, see openDemocracy’s dataset on grants from top DAF sponsors to 'culture war' groups (2017–20), <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1BMhem4zBtpY1q9qZOWy87ewnOu1hzd7OjnxOA-07vfM/>, accessed 6 March 2026.





