RUSI JournalVOLUME 171ISSUE 5

Reassessing Structural, Contextual Constraints in FATF Evaluations

Courtesy of Abi Rogers

Courtesy of Abi Rogers


In this Research Article, the author argues that FATF Mutual Evaluations underplay governance and structural constraints, leading to unrealistic expectations of AML/CFT systems.

Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Mutual Evaluations insufficiently acknowledge the role of domestic structural and contextual determinants in the effectiveness of anti-money laundering and counterterrorist finance (AML/CFT) efforts. Mariano Federici draws on fourth-round Mutual Evaluation Reports for Argentina (2024), Brazil (2023) and Mexico (2018) to show that crucial domestic factors are seen as background conditions rather than causal variables. This approach weakens AML/CFT measures. The article calls for more explicit, causal treatment of these constraints, particularly in Global South contexts.

unlockedThis content is available to you

Read the full text on Taylor & Francis

This link will open in a new window


Taylor and Francis publishes the RUSI Journal and Whitehall Papers on behalf of RUSI


WRITTEN BY

Mariano Federici

View profile



Explore our related content