RUSI JournalVOLUME 171ISSUE 6

The Arctic and the Limits of Theatre Strategy

The Arctic reveals a deeper strategic reality. Europe and the Indo-Pacific are not separable arenas but components of a single deterrence continuum. Courtesy of TrendFrame/Adobe Stock

The Arctic reveals a deeper strategic reality. Europe and the Indo-Pacific are not separable arenas but components of a single deterrence continuum. Courtesy of TrendFrame/Adobe Stock


Arguing that the Arctic should be considered the seam between the Euro-Atlantic and the Indo-Pacific, the authors used this Research Article to make the case that we need to rethink our mental maps when it comes to deterrence.

Modern great power competition is happening across transregional seams, not within neat regional boundaries, which American strategy remains organised around. Genevieve Cickavage, Ryan R Duffy, Jahara Matisek, Jeremy M McKenzie and Chad M Pillai argue for a ‘seam-based’ strategy for the Arctic, where instead of being a peripheral theatre, it becomes the connective seam linking the Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific. This redefines deterrence by prioritising the resilience of transregional systems over optimising forces for isolated conflicts.

unlockedThis content is available to you

Read the full text on Taylor & Francis

This link will open in a new window


Taylor and Francis publishes the RUSI Journal and Whitehall Papers on behalf of RUSI


WRITTEN BY

Genevieve Cickavage

View profile

Ryan R Duffy

View profile

Lieutenant Colonel Jahara Matisek

Guest Contributor

View profile

Jeremy M McKenzie

View profile

Chad M Pillai

View profile



Explore our related content