The author argues that attrition is often dictated by terrain, force disposition and operational realities rather than choice or institutional bias.
This article reframes attrition as an enduring and essential method of achieving military and political objectives. Amos C Fox argues that attrition is often dictated by terrain, force disposition and operational realities rather than choice or institutional bias. He critiques the manoeuvre warfare paradigm, instead proposing a comprehensive theory of attrition centred on the manipulation of firepower overmatch relative to battlefield conditions and enemy posture. This theory offers policymakers, strategists and military leaders a more realistic framework for understanding how wars are fought and won, especially in the context of industrialised, high-intensity conflicts of the 21st century.
WRITTEN BY
Amos C Fox
- Jim McLeanMedia Relations Manager+44 (0)7917 373 069JimMc@rusi.org

