RUSI JournalVOLUME 170ISSUE 6/7

A Theory of Attrition

A military wins by generating more enemy losses than the enemy can sustain, in relation to its own ability to generate and maintain resources. Courtesy of Steve Speller / Alamy

A military wins by generating more enemy losses than the enemy can sustain, in relation to its own ability to generate and maintain resources. Courtesy of Steve Speller / Alamy


The author argues that attrition is often dictated by terrain, force disposition and operational realities rather than choice or institutional bias.

This article reframes attrition as an enduring and essential method of achieving military and political objectives. Amos C Fox argues that attrition is often dictated by terrain, force disposition and operational realities rather than choice or institutional bias. He critiques the manoeuvre warfare paradigm, instead proposing a comprehensive theory of attrition centred on the manipulation of firepower overmatch relative to battlefield conditions and enemy posture. This theory offers policymakers, strategists and military leaders a more realistic framework for understanding how wars are fought and won, especially in the context of industrialised, high-intensity conflicts of the 21st century.

unlockedThis content is available to you

Read the full text on Taylor & Francis

This link will open in a new window


Taylor and Francis publishes the RUSI Journal and Whitehall Papers on behalf of RUSI


WRITTEN BY

Amos C Fox

View profile


Footnotes


Explore our related content