RUSI JournalVOLUME 170ISSUE 6/7

Resilience, Defence in an Era of Global Tensions and Uncertainty

NATO may gain insights from nature on how to develop novel and active approaches to improve resilience. Courtesy of tashechka / Adobe Stock

NATO may gain insights from nature on how to develop novel and active approaches to improve resilience. Courtesy of tashechka / Adobe Stock


The authors argue that NATO’s approach to resilience should build on knowledge of how natural systems persist and evolve.

Resilience is critical to NATO, but its implementation is challenging. Stig Rune Sellevåg, Peter D E Biggins and Paul Martin argue that NATO’s approach to resilience should build on knowledge of how natural systems persist and evolve. The selection of advantageous configurations for systemic persistence is important for resilience. This requires, as a minimum, maintaining stability, learning and novelty generation. NATO should consider capabilities for anticipating tipping points and a reconfiguration strategy for dealing with risks for systemic collapse. Importantly, resilience requires active processes where ‘blue-sky thinking’ and novel ideas are turned into practical solutions, taking into consideration human thinking and behaviour.

unlockedThis content is available to you

Read the full text on Taylor & Francis

This link will open in a new window


Taylor and Francis publishes the RUSI Journal and Whitehall Papers on behalf of RUSI


WRITTEN BY

Stig Rune Sellevåg

View profile

Peter D E Biggins

View profile

Dr Paul Martin CBE

Distinguished Fellow

View profile


Footnotes


Explore our related content