<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/template/rss.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>RUSI Defence Policy Feed</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/</link>
<description></description>
<managingEditor>web@rusi.org</managingEditor>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
<item>
<title>Not with a bang but a whimper: Europe’s pending denuclearisation</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.orgC4B9A677D2E3B6/ </link>
<description>Within the next decade, European aircraft capable of delivering US nuclear weapons are due to be withdrawn from service. What are the options available to NATO in the debate over the continuance of its tactical nuclear capability?</description>
<date>2010-03-12 16:21:26</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Building Global Maritime Security through Global Cooperation</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/defencesystems/ref:A4B8E4AE18C3D7/ </link>
<description>What are the challenges of achieving global maritime security and how important is a federation of national and regional systems in overcoming them?</description>
<date>2010-03-03 11:41:26</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Complex Threats: The Globalisation of Domestic and Foreign Security</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:A4B86698501C53/ </link>
<description>Domestic crime, terrorism and insurgency now go hand in hand. Western counter-terrorism and home affairs policy must embrace the new challenges and adapt to combat the interlinked threats</description>
<date>2010-02-25 12:14:02</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Russian Military Reform: Prospects and Reforms</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:A4B86651F4DD35/ </link>
<description>Russia has recognised the need to transform the army following its poor display during the 2008 war with Georgia. However, more must be done if it is to create fully modern and professional armed forces</description>
<date>2010-02-25 11:58:39</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Reclaiming the Art of British Strategic Thinking</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:A4B8661FFCA6E3/ </link>
<description>British military strategy currently fails to adhere to the lessons of great classical strategists. A new strategic ‘grammar’ that incorporates these insights is necessary</description>
<date>2010-02-25 11:41:49</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Shaping the international maritime discourse: the Royal Navy’s role</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C4B7C13DD39AA8/ </link>
<description>The use of the sea remains fundamental to international security. At a time of increasing public spending constraints, what is the significance of naval force – and of the Royal Navy in particular – in supporting national and international defence and security.</description>
<date>2010-02-17 16:09:26</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The US Administration’s new Missile Defence plans</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C4B7A87F069E3D/ </link>
<description>The Obama Administration has outlined a refocusing of the United States missile defence plans, revising the approach previously taken by the Bush White House. Central to the plan is the deployment of more mobile systems that could assuage the once sceptical Russians.</description>
<date>2010-02-16 12:03:47</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Civilian-Military Collaboration: The Stabilisation Unit Coming of Age</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C4B715FF659286/ </link>
<description>This lecture outlined the progress made across the UK Government in its ability to adopt a comprehensive approach focusing on the increasing contributions made by the Stabilisation Unit, particularly in Afghanistan. It reviewed the debate about the respective roles of civilians and the military in stabilisation, and the ways in which civilian skills can best be generated and managed for hostile environments. Richard Teuten provided an update on the enhanced responsibilities being taken on by the Unit and refer to other complementary changes underway.</description>
<date>2010-02-09 13:16:01</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Droning on: the American bolt from the blue</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C4B702AC47A4BF/ </link>
<description>The latest Quadrennial Defense Review promises to increase the numbers, sophistication and use of unmanned aerial vehicles, known as drones. Their use has rendered the boundaries of the theatres of war more fluid, requiring the rapid integration of this weapon to be piloted more carefully than ever before.</description>
<date>2010-02-08 15:20:03</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Green Paper - Premises for a Strategic Defence Review?</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C4B6C4E6458A39/ </link>
<description>The Green Paper to the Strategic Defence Review highlights strategic premises which should be presented to the public in the run up to the General Election.</description>
<date>2010-02-05 17:02:11</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Green Paper and RUSI's contribution</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C4B6C43B6DB9DD/ </link>
<description>Since the Government announced a Defence Green Paper in July 2009,  and the undertaking of a Strategic Defence Review after the next General Election, RUSI has consistently delivered insightful analysis and commentary which has helped frame the national debate. The series of working papers addressing the Future Defence Review have received widespread media attention and praise from within the defence community.</description>
<date>2010-02-05 16:14:17</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Ministry of Defence Green Paper and top level defence policy</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C4B6C2E49D19B4/ </link>
<description>The Defence Green Paper hints at more cooperation with Europeans as the way forward, but a need for short-term cuts may damage the coherence of defence outputs before the defence review is completed.</description>
<date>2010-02-05 14:44:03</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bigger changes are on the way for the US military</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C4B685819CE68C/ </link>
<description>The latest Quadrennial Defense Review, presented by the US Department of Defense, outlines a five-year programme until 2015 that sees the US playing a 'global role' in 'a complex environment'. It could pave the way for big changes as it accomodates itself to adjusting military capability so as to be able to do more with its allies.</description>
<date>2010-02-02 17:13:46</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Our most devastating weapon is agility</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C4B5D811C5B7C2/ </link>
<description>Our services must get smarter to cope with today’s threats. Their ability to adapt and maintain their high professionalism and dedication in a range of roles and with a variety of technologies is key to playing to British strengths.</description>
<date>2010-01-25 11:37:20</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>RUSI Future Defence Review paper: UK’s Armed Forces face personnel cuts of 20% over the next six years</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/news/ref:N4B4C60CD6E4DE/ </link>
<description>The growing costs of UK defence capabilities, combined with cuts in the Ministry of Defence (MoD) budget as a result of the nation's fiscal crisis, will make it impossible to preserve current numbers of service personnel and front-line capabilities.</description>
<date>2010-01-12 11:45:51</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Defence and the General Election: Labour's Defence Quagmire</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/defencesystems/ref:A4AF16F583D391/ </link>
<description>Amidst ongoing economic woes, defence has emerged as one of the most challenging policy areas for the Labour government.</description>
<date>2010-01-04 12:00:00</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The turn of the wheel: 2010 and the return of old security problems</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/defencesystems/ref:C4B4124C0DCB72/ </link>
<description>As the effects of the global recession begins to be felt, this year will emphasise some new political realities in the international order. They will form the backdrop to the return of some traditional security issues.</description>
<date>2010-01-03 23:18:18</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Assessing Value for Money at the Ministry of Defence</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/defencesystems/ref:C4B2BA21424302/ </link>
<description>The most arresting point made by the latest report from the National Audit Office concerns the slippage of major projects. It reveals that the majority of the increase in project costs is due 'to deliberate decisions to slip projects, taken corporately by the Department as part of a wider package designed to address a gap between estimated funding and the cost of the Defence budget over the next ten years'. </description>
<date>2009-12-18 15:43:59</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Strategic Thinking for the Age of Austerity</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:A4B28F1972200C/ </link>
<description>The winning entry in the 2009 Trench Gascoigne Essay Prize argues that Britain's future defence policy must look beyond counter-insurgency</description>
<date>2009-12-16 14:41:53</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Nuclear Policy at Sea: A Part-Time Deterrent Will Not Do!</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:A4B28F0CD0211A/ </link>
<description>Credible deterrence remains the core of Britain's nuclear posture: further cutting resources for this would be self-defeating</description>
<date>2009-12-16 14:38:31</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Reading Insurgencies: Review Feature</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:A4B28EDF601CA0/ </link>
<description>Reviews of two key new works on counter-insurgency</description>
<date>2009-12-16 14:25:59</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>British Civil-Military Integration: History and Next Steps</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:A4B28EBBC57B87/ </link>
<description>Government and military have yet to create a truly comprehensive approach to operations. Creating cross-departmental frameworks will need a set of bold reforms</description>
<date>2009-12-16 14:20:36</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Adapting Government for Stabilisation and Counter-insurgency Operations</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:A4B28EAD46B941/ </link>
<description>The Afghan campaign demands reform of government institutions back in Whitehall. Ultimately, however, success will depend on the quality of Afghan leadership</description>
<date>2009-12-16 14:14:19</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The cost of Afghanistan to UK Defence</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C4B28B2C882CF9/ </link>
<description>Bring on new Chinooks. But the defence budget can't cover the needs of a long-term occupation</description>
<date>2009-12-16 10:15:47</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Defence Cuts: Something is going to give</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C4B28AC1602813/ </link>
<description>Bob Ainsworth, the Defence Secretary, has announced deep cuts in military personnel and equipment to fund a £900 million boost for the Afghanistan campaign. However the figures may not stack up. Something is going to give and in a big way. Defence is living through a slow motion road accident while it waits for the political wheel to turn and give it some strategic direction. </description>
<date>2009-12-16 09:48:04</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sixty-five thousand tonnes of ambition</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C4B20EF703EDFF/ </link>
<description>Recent reports of Indian intentions to purchase an aircraft carrier from Britain would not substantially add to India's ambitions to be a global power. However, the rumours are symbolic of India's delicate strategic balancing act as it shifts its focus to China.</description>
<date>2009-12-10 13:03:22</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Extracting Counterinsurgency lessons: The Malayan Emergency and Afghanistan</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C4B14E068758F1/ </link>
<description>British success in Malaya appeared to show how an insurgency could be defeated by Western-led forces. The campaign was plundered for ‘lessons’ – for Vietnam in particular. The latter’s failure, however, led critics to argue that Malaya was a special case which did not offer transferable ‘lessons’. An analysis of the general principles underlying British success in Malaya can nevertheless still provide important policy implications for Afghanistan. </description>
<date>2009-11-28 09:00:00</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Gray Report</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C4AF850322FE64/ </link>
<description>The review of the government's acquisition programme should be welcomed by all who care about equipping our Armed Forces with the right equipment, at the right time, within an affordable programme - and it is to be hoped that this includes both present defence ministers and their successors after the next election.</description>
<date>2009-11-09 17:37:51</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Two major reports on UK defence acquisition, two contrasting visions of reform</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C4AF2BCEC6F087/ </link>
<description>While both the Gray report on defence acquisition and the Haddon-Cave report on the Nimrod disaster cover a similar subject, they offer very different visions for future reform in the Ministry of Defence.</description>
<date>2009-11-05 12:11:08</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Potential of Renewable Energies</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/defencesystems/ref:A4AF1A93900371/ </link>
<description>How the German government's plan to replace fossil fuels with renewables will affect the German military sector</description>
<date>2009-11-04 16:19:04</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lean Green Fighting Machines?</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/defencesystems/ref:A4AF1A82F8B082/ </link>
<description>How the MoD can lower its carbon emissions in the near, medium and long terms</description>
<date>2009-11-04 16:14:35</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Fully Burdened Cost of Energy</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/defencesystems/ref:A4AF1A7751FBD1/ </link>
<description>How is energy currently used in defence, and how could it be used in the future?</description>
<date>2009-11-04 16:11:49</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fighting Green: The Next Revolution in Military Affairs</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/defencesystems/ref:A4AF1A6A285191/ </link>
<description>The UK's MoD is not alone in its effort to become green - US forces are also developing the efficiency and security of their energy supplies</description>
<date>2009-11-04 16:08:17</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Alternative Energy for the Military</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/defencesystems/ref:A4AF1A5C8AAB7E/ </link>
<description>The military's operational dependency on fossil fuels needs to be reduced - how can the MoD tackle this problem in the medium and long term?</description>
<date>2009-11-04 16:03:36</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Air/Land Integration: A Venusian View From Mars</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/defencesystems/ref:A4AF1A4D95671C/ </link>
<description>Inherent differences between the UK's armed services have made Air/Land integration difficult to achieve</description>
<date>2009-11-04 15:59:44</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Management of Defence: International Comparisons</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/defencesystems/ref:A4AF1A26BDFEE4/ </link>
<description>How do India, China, Israel and Japan handle defence spending and co-ordination compared to the UK?</description>
<date>2009-11-04 15:49:20</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agility in the Setting and Changing of Operational Requirements</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/defencesystems/ref:A4AF1A18799CB8/ </link>
<description>What needs to be done to improve the process of setting operational requirements and altering them when the defence environment changes?</description>
<date>2009-11-04 15:46:31</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Shaping Future Strategic Capability: The F-35 Manufacturing Approach</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/defencesystems/ref:A4AF19CF309D4F/ </link>
<description>Significant new approaches to manufacturing the F-35 fighter have yet to be appreciated by the US authorities</description>
<date>2009-11-04 15:26:25</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>China and the Defence-Industrial Renaissance</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/defencesystems/ref:A4AF19BBD54954/ </link>
<description>Major increases in China's procurement spending are changing the country's defence industry</description>
<date>2009-11-04 15:21:43</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Securing Britain's Future</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/defencesystems/ref:A4AF1728DE409D/ </link>
<description>Why Britain's defence industry has decided to take a higher profile in the public debate</description>
<date>2009-11-04 12:25:12</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Acquisition Issues for the Next Government</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/defencesystems/ref:A4AF17089BFE59/ </link>
<description>Evidence is emerging from many quarters of a deepening crisis in the MoD.</description>
<date>2009-11-04 12:16:11</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Future of UK Air Power</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:A4AEB23617A11F/ </link>
<description>As a defence review approaches, Britain's air power is once again under the microscope. More than even, a joint capacity is vital</description>
<date>2009-10-30 17:33:26</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Unsettling Networks: Review Essay</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:A4AEB111CC87A7/ </link>
<description>There are fundamental societal changes taking places, argues Castells. It is unclear that bureaucratic frameworks of state power can keep up</description>
<date>2009-10-30 16:18:00</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Up to the task? India's response to shifting security patterns</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C4AE860CCDFB55/ </link>
<description>India faces important economic and strategic choices over the next decade, especially in terms of its diplomatic relations and defence industry. While there are limited signs that India has made positive steps to improve regional relations, urgent reform is needed at the national level to ensure its security.</description>
<date>2009-10-28 15:20:32</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Conservative Party's vision for the UK's counter-terrorism strategy in the Gulf</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C4AD6FC9F41077/ </link>
<description>Speaking at RUSI's Qatar office on 12 October 2009, RUSI Council member and Shadow Security Minister Baroness Pauline Neville-Jones discussed the role the Middle East and the Gulf region could play in Britain's fight against terrorism over the next few years.</description>
<date>2009-10-15 11:52:26</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>MoD Acquisition and the Gray Report</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C4A96780774EB3/ </link>
<description>The Ministry of Defence’s (MoD) equipment acquisition system has come under increasing fire over the last decade. And not without reason: huge effort, continuous change and much MoD hype has not brought improvement in delivery terms that we need.</description>
<date>2009-08-27 13:18:25</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Double or Quits in Afghanistan?</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C4A6D7D483D5C3/ </link>
<description>A new policy of ‘Double or Quits’ has recently emerged for Afghanistan. Following a surge in troop levels both the US and UK political leadership hope for a rapid improvement in the security situation, but without this calls for a reassessment of priorities will grow louder. There is, however, the opportunity for a ‘third way’, modelled on the British experience in Basra after 2006, where a reduced footprint provided the opportunity for the success of local Iraqi forces. </description>
<date>2009-07-27 11:34:54</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>CVF: For the Nation, Not the Navy</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C4A4DEB373BC51/ </link>
<description>The UK’s Future Aircraft Carrier (CVF) programme has come under pressure in the media for cost increases and potential job cuts which may follow its completion. A recent think-tank report has questioned CVF’s future contribution and relevance to potential operations. These reports, however, neglect the demonstrated relevance of aircraft carriers in supporting a range of recent UK operations, and do not appear to appreciate the absolute value of carriers in fighting, and crucially deterring, conflict.</description>
<date>2009-07-03 12:40:18</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>MoD faces 10-15 per cent budget cut</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/news/ref:N4A4CA63D8E455/ </link>
<description>A new RUSI report declares the MoD faces a budget cut of around 10-15 per cent in real terms between 2010 and 2016</description>
<date>2009-07-02 13:26:54</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Britain’s New Nuclear Debate: A Credible Road Map for Disarmament</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:A49F8808F852F5/ </link>
<description>Obama’s call for a nuclear weapon-free world chimes with British policy on deterrence and disarmament. As arms reductions become more likely, is Britain really onboard? </description>
<date>2009-04-29 17:30:09</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tough Choices – The Transformation of the US Defence Budget</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C49E72AA69DE2E/ </link>
<description>The US Defense Secretary Robert Gates has outlined plans to ‘profoundly reform’ US military spending. They include curbs on significant weapons programmes and a boost to more strategically focused projects. The underlining themes behind this new policy will certainly have implications well beyond the US defence acquisition community. </description>
<date>2009-04-16 14:05:35</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Brown’s ‘Grand Global Bargain’ and Reducing UK Nuclear Weapons Levels</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C49CCCAF89EFD0/ </link>
<description>In a major policy speech on nuclear issues, Prime Minister Gordon Brown recently suggested that Trident could be placed on the international negotiation table should there be a serious move towards multilateral disarmament. If such a gambit were to succeed, it would require something more than a leap of faith in trust. </description>
<date>2009-03-27 12:53:28</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>House of Commons censures defence equipment delays</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C49ABC3C56FFA0/ </link>
<description>The House of Commons Defence Committee has published a damning report on Defence Equipment, highlighting the failure to translate strategy into an affordable equipment programme. </description>
<date>2009-03-02 11:47:49</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Overdue Defence Review: Old Questions, New Answers</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:A494A877BD9F6A/ </link>
<description>The forthcoming defence review will have to respond to pressures on resources, acknowledge the need to build public understanding of defence, and consider the best means to conceive of effects-based operations.</description>
<date>2008-12-18 17:26:10</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Britain's National Security: Compulsion and Discretion</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:A494A8733DABE4/ </link>
<description>Britain’s overall military strategy must be dominated by maritime considerations, and the national security policy that the strategy serves has to remain within reach of, though not always in lock-step with, that of the United States.</description>
<date>2008-12-18 17:24:11</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>A Force for Influence?: Making British Defence Effective</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:A494A86FBAEAF3/ </link>
<description>Whatever adjustments to the military procurement programme are made in the defence review, the UK will still be a major military force with a future aggregate capability superior to that of any other US ally.</description>
<date>2008-12-18 17:23:54</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>RUSI Discussion Paper: The Hard Choices</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:C492D7CC824145/ </link>
<description>In preparation for its 'Defence in the Round: The United Kingdom’s Needs, Priorities and Resources' conference, RUSI releases a discussion paper posing twenty key questions about the UK's national military strategy.</description>
<date>2008-11-26 17:13:39</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Turkey’s Foreign Policy: Strategic Depth</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/newsbrief/ref:A48DCF033DD420/ </link>
<description>The ruling AKP’s foreign policy of ‘strategic depth’ invites the possibility of restructuring relations between the East and the West on a footing that reconciles its traditional roles with both.</description>
<date>2008-09-26 15:23:03</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Papering Over the Cracks? An Analysis of the New French Defence and National Security White Paper</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/newsbrief/ref:A48871F0AA0319/ </link>
<description>This article outlines the main areas of the most recent French Defence and National Security White Paper, and provides an analysis of the implications on France's foreign policy aspirations</description>
<date>2008-07-23 13:09:07</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Introducing France’s New Defence &amp; National Security Policy</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/news/ref:N4889A4DCA88B4/ </link>
<description>France’s new Defence and National Security White Paper was presented at RUSI by Jean-Claude Mallet, Chairman of the French White Paper National Commission, on 02 July 2008.</description>
<date>2008-07-02 11:00:00</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Modernising France’s Security and Defence Apparatus: a French National Security Council?</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/newsbrief/ref:A47B98CFB65C2A/ </link>
<description>This article explores the changes to France’s security and defence apparatus currently under discussion in the halls of power in Paris. It seems the changes will result in a further strengthening of the role of the president in the French political system.</description>
<date>2008-02-18 13:49:49</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Defence and security put ‘at risk’ by ignoring parliamentary government</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/news/ref:N47B4E10C9F25A/ </link>
<description>An independent analysis published in this month's Journal argues that defence and security need to be overseen in parallel by Government and Parliament</description>
<date>2008-02-15 00:50:24</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The UK Government Consultation Paper on War Powers: 25 October 2007</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/news/ref:C47275D48D1C3C/ </link>
<description>The UK Government has just launched a consultation on the use of War Powers and the Royal Perogative.</description>
<date>2007-10-30 16:38:07</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>RUSI Launches British Security Programme</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/news/ref:N4705FEC66BFA2/ </link>
<description>RUSI announces a new programme devoted to the contemporary challanges facing British Security Policy. </description>
<date>2007-10-05 10:13:31</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Renewing Britain’s Independent Strategic Nuclear Deterrent: A Debate</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/news/ref:C45F69446BEF2F/ </link>
<description>Conference report on the 7 March 2007 proceedings at RUSI.  The debate was led by Des Browne, Michael Codner, Steven Haines, and Paul Ingram.</description>
<date>2007-03-13 12:00:00</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>RUSI report highlights lingering questions surrounding proposed renewal of the United Kingdom’s Independent Nuclear Deterrent</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/news/ref:N45E55CB91FE32/ </link>
<description>Although the Government has presented a strong case advocating the renewal of the United Kingdom’s independent nuclear deterrent, there are still lingering questions that need to be addressed. This is the key finding of ‘The United Kingdom’s Independent Strategic Nuclear Deterrent: Observations on the 2006 White Paper and Issues for the Parliamentary Debate’, a new report published by the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI).</description>
<date>2007-02-28 10:46:39</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The UK’s Independent Strategic Nuclear Deterrent and the White Paper</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/news/ref:C45745AE62339A/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>2006-12-04 17:00:00</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>In an uncertain world, unilateral disarmament would be folly</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/news/ref:N456F7ACC5109D/ </link>
<description>It is likely that maintaining a minimum deterrent will be the policy recommendation that the government will put forward in the white paper, and perhaps it will be this policy which parliament will discuss and vote upon.</description>
<date>2006-11-30 00:45:00</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Factors Contributing to the Trident Decision</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/news/ref:C44D0719016D80/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>2006-08-02 10:35:54</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Future of British Defence: The Liberal Democrat View</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f7af83beb/ </link>
<description>In presenting his Party's response to the New Chapter Paul Keetch discusses the future of British Defence Policy.</description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:44</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>High Noon for British Grand Strategy</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f7b69264b/ </link>
<description>Michael Codner provides a compelling round-up of UK military options and the implications of war in Iraq</description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:44</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Future of British Defence: The Opposition View</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f7afe084b/ </link>
<description>Bernard Jenkin, the Shadow Secretary of State for Defence, assesses the New Chapter to the St</description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:44</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The New Chapter: A Blueprint for Reform</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f7b04926b/ </link>
<description>Geoff Hoon, the UK Secretary of State for Defence presents an overview of the New Chapter to</description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:44</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>British Military Strategy Home and Away</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f7a02bdab/ </link>
<description>The philosophy behind the UKs processes of force development, requirements capture and operational p</description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:43</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bringing the Armed Forces into a New Millennium</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f79b3a80b/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:43</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fighting Europe's Wars the British Way: The European Politics of British Defence Doctrine</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f7a0e566b/ </link>
<description>The British way of warfare is quite different to that of others - a fact that reinforces the politic</description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:43</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Conventially-Armed UK Trident?</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f795a1117/ </link>
<description>Can Trident be adapted to a non-nuclear. more conventianally armed weapon?</description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:43</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Twenty Questions on Defence for a General Election</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f77d6190b/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:42</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>European Security and Defence Policy: A Key Project for European Unification</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f784f40cb/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:42</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>UK Defence Spending</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f77c9c28b/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:42</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>British Defence Doctrine and the British Operations</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f78e30bcc/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:42</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>European Defence: Another set of questions</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f76c4926b/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:41</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Introduction The General Election and Defence</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f767b492e/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:41</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Perspectives on Current MoD Policy</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f775c338b/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:41</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Implementing a Policy for People</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f771f40cb/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:41</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Intergrated Project Teams: The MoDs New Hot Potato?</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f76ca5ecb/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:41</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Security and Defence Policies of the Conservative Party</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f76d6b54b/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:41</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The House of Commons Defence Committee Report Lessons of Kosovo</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f76a04cab/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:41</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Security and Defence Policies of the Labour Government</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f76879fab/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:41</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>European Security and Defence Co-operation</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f7502487b/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:40</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Future of Air Power</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f75d10ffb/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:40</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Europe and Defence</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f750de13b/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:40</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Neither Art nor Science - Towards a Discipline of War</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f74e99b7b/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:40</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Kosovo Air Campaigns Impact on Russian Military Thinking</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f75ac0c7b/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>2004-06-18 12:23:40</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Is the US on the correct anti-terrorist course? - Part I</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/monitor/ref:A473AECFB231DF/ </link>
<description>In the first of a two-part article Amy Leyland examines current threat perception and resource allocation by US officials </description>
<date>2004-03-01 12:00:00</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Four Wars and Counting...Enduring Conflict and the Need for a New Approach to US Strategy and Force</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:P407563BCE74F1/ </link>
<description>This article describes ten major changes to American military planning and strategy to address the current geopolitical situation.</description>
<date>2004-02-08 15:00:00</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>11 September and Afghanistan: Implications for the SDR and UK C4ISTAR Requirements</title>
<link>http://www.rusi.org/publications/journal/ref:J40c1f7b81d34b/ </link>
<description>Major General Robert Fulton, Capability Manager (Information Superiority) assesses the  effec</description>
<date>2002-10-18 12:00:00</date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
