Is the US on the correct anti-terrorist course? - Part I
By Amy Leyland
1 Mar 2004
The ways in which individuals and societies perceive risk has reduced the efficiency of the US response to the threat of terrorism since 11 September 2001. A large body of academic literature exists from economists and sociologists on the way in which people perceive and respond to risk. There is also considerable criticism of US policies for being irrational or ill-focused. This article aims to substantiate anecdotal evidence linking the two.
Add your comments
1 Mar 2004
The ways in which individuals and societies perceive risk has reduced the efficiency of the US response to the threat of terrorism since 11 September 2001. A large body of academic literature exists from economists and sociologists on the way in which people perceive and respond to risk. There is also considerable criticism of US policies for being irrational or ill-focused. This article aims to substantiate anecdotal evidence linking the two.
You need 4 credits to access this item
If you are a member or registered user, please login
Not already a member and have not yet registered?
Add your comments
Copyright © 2008 RUSI