The Technology of Trident: Science and Risk in Public Debate
By Gavin Ireland
1 May 2007
The Trident debate was notable for two reasons. Firstly, the open manner in which it was conducted. Secondly, the level-headed debate engaged in by those opposed to Trident. Focusing on scientific objections, rather than traditional lines of argument based on moral, religious and legal reasons was an important step for advocacy groups. However, some misconceptions persisted. This article considers what was missed out in the public debate.
1 May 2007
The Trident debate was notable for two reasons. Firstly, the open manner in which it was conducted. Secondly, the level-headed debate engaged in by those opposed to Trident. Focusing on scientific objections, rather than traditional lines of argument based on moral, religious and legal reasons was an important step for advocacy groups. However, some misconceptions persisted. This article considers what was missed out in the public debate.
You need 4 credits to access this item
If you are a member or registered user, please login
Not already a member and have not yet registered?
Copyright © 2009 RUSI